Goose wrote:
As an American I really know nothing about UK politics, can someone explain why a "hung parliament" is bad. To my understanding it means that there is an equal amount of each party or something or a balance per say is this bad?
Basically, what a party needs to always haves its laws passed is a majority in parliament. So no matter how the other parties feel, the majority party gets its own way. (Having >50% so full control).
In a hung parliament however, no party has more than 50% of the Parliament, so all the parties have to agree to laws, meaning laws take longer to pass through the house of commons if at all.
In the US you do not have this problem, because you have a 2 party system, so one party will be a majority and one a minority regardless of votes, whereas we have loads of parties (Labour, Conservatives, Lib Dems, Green, BNP, Pirate, Monster Raving Looney Party to name a few) so it is possible to have multiple parties in the top 50% to govern, which is a hung parliament.